2023 CLM Summary Findings

General findings from all CLM platforms

National Response Center and Whatsapp Groups
(873 Clients, Jan-Dec 2023)

Facility Exit Interviews
(1,126 Respondents, 4 Rounds, Jun and Sep 2022, Jun and Sep 2023)

Community Forums
(165 Participants, 4 Rounds, Jul 2022, Apr, Aug and Oct 2023)

Facility Observations through Mystery Clients
(16 facilities, 90 observations, 3 Rounds, May, Aug, Oct 2023)





Awareness of THE Services

Indicator
Information about the facility services are disseminated outside the facility (catchment area). 

Providers are providing additional information about the service and the facility.


Findings
There were clients who did not know about the services of the facility before going to avail of the service despite living with the community around the facility.


Recommended Actions to Improve Awareness

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

Accessibility of Services

Indicator
Clients did not wait for more than one hour before the service was provided. 

Clients did not hesitate to go to the facility (because of accessibility issues).


Findings
There were clients who waited for more than 1 hour or up to 4 hours before the service were provided. 


Recommended Actions to Improve Accessibility

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

AVAILABILITY of services

Indicator
The intended service was available and provided

For services that were not available, clients were provided information where to avail it (or referred).


Findings
Some staff of the facility were unaware of the services available in the facility. For example, the HIV team were not aware if there are Xray services for TB diagnosis.

The printed profile of the facilities are outdated. Some services listed are no longer available.


Recommended Actions to Improve Availability

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

AFFORDABILITY of services

Indicator
Client did not pay for or did not use its own money for the services provided (on services that are free).


Findings
Some clients were required to pay for the service, despite of the expectation (general knowledge) that HIV tests, STI consultations, diagnosis, treatment and other services are supposed to be free.


Recommended Actions to Improve Affordability

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

APPROPRIATENESS of services

Indicator
Services specific to KP were provided

Services specific to young person (24 and younger) were provided.


Findings
There were no services specific to KP and Young People. 

HIV, STI, TB services were provided to all who go to the facilities.

As an example, there are no KP youth peer counsellors,  no transgender-specific information or counselling services (to discuss TG-specific issues).


Recommended Actions to Improve Appropriateness

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

ACCEPTABILITY of services

Indicator
Client did not feel stigmatized or discriminated when the service was provided.

Client did not feel afraid to access the service (did not worry about other clients knowing its KP or HIV status).


Findings
There were clients who reported some experience of stigma or discrimination while receiving the services. They were:


Recommended Actions to Improve Appropriateness

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)

Accountability of service Providers

Indicator
Client is aware of mechanisms to report complaints about the service.

Client feels confident that the provider made him/her fully aware of the service provided.


Findings
Multiple clients were not aware where to raise issues or report complaints about the service or the providers.

There were very limited client feedback mechanism as this is not part of the PHA and facility policy.


Recommended Actions to Improve Appropriateness

In the facilities

In the surrounding communities

In partnership with KPAC and other organizations in the province (HWW, APNG, WVI, etc)